In recent years, the interaction between local government debts and corporate
innovation has garnered significant attention from both academia and policymakers. The Third
Plenary Session further highlighted that scientific macroeconomic regulation and effective
government governance are intrinsic requirements for leveraging the advantages of the
socialist market economy system. It stressed the importance of balancing development and
security, preventing local government debt risks, constructing a high-level market economy
system, and stimulating society’s intrinsic motivation and innovative vitality. Against this
backdrop, this paper leverages a quasi-natural experiment created by the State Council’s
special supervision on clearing overdue payments owed by local governments, to investigate
the impact mechanism of overdue payment clearance on corporate innovation. This study
contributes to a comprehensive understanding of the role of effective local government
governance in the development of new-quality productivity in China and provides policy
recommendations to consolidate enterprises' status as the main actors in technology innovation
decisions, R&D investment, research organization, and the commercialization of research
outcomes.
This study employs the Difference in Differences (DID) method and Quantile Control Method
(QCM), based on the State Council’s special supervision on clearing overdue payments owed
by local governments, to examine the promotion effect of overdue payment clearance on
corporate innovation. Key findings include: ⅰ . Overdue payment clearance can alleviate
liquidity constraints for enterprises, increasing funds available for R&D and thereby enhancing
their willingness to invest in innovation. ⅱ . It also optimizes the financing environment and
mitigates market distortions, improving valuations of innovation projects and thus boosting
enterprises' inclination towards innovation investment. ⅲ.The governance effects of overdue
payment clearance are more pronounced in firms with higher levels of innovation focus and in
emerging industries. ⅳ.Further analysis using QCM reveals that regions with dense emerging
industries and effective policy implementation, such as Beijing and Hubei, exhibit the most
significant policy treatment effects.
Based on the above analysis, the following policy recommendations are proposed. Firstly,
given that overdue payment clearance significantly alleviates liquidity constraints for
enterprises, the government should further promote the full implementation of overdue
payment clearance, actively push forward the “decentralization, regulation, and service”
reform, and timely supervise the effectiveness of these reforms. Land finance has historically
driven economic growth while amplifying the fragility of local government finances,
particularly through government debt arrears, which have severely undermined the social
credit environment and reduced the effectiveness of macroeconomic regulation and
government governance. Specialized supervision facilitates the formation of local government
debt repayment mechanisms, effectively resolving debt arrears issues, reducing financial
burdens for private enterprises, enhancing business credit, and lowering financing costs,
thereby fostering effective innovation project investment opportunities and promoting
economic restructuring, the development of emerging industries, and the perfection of the
socialist market economy system. Notably, despite multiple policies issued by the central
government to resolve government debt and support private enterprises, challenges remain in
implementation due to objective conditions. During this process, it is essential to adopt
stringent measures to prevent the addition of new hidden debts and ensure genuine debt
resolution, creating a more favorable business environment for enterprise innovation and
encouraging greater engagement in technology innovation and market expansion.
Secondly, while guarding against local government debt risks, the government must prioritize
the critical role of strategic emerging industry enterprises in the innovation-driven
development strategy, vigorously cultivating the innovative vitality of private enterprises.
Under the support of land finance, local governments often pursued performance-based
expansion through excessive financing and large-scale infrastructure investments, leading to
crowding out of emerging industry innovation investments and increased government debt
pressure. Given the specific deployment of comprehensive deepening reforms outlined in the
communiqué of the Third Plenary Session, emphasizing the construction of systems to support
comprehensive innovation and the improvement of the macroeconomic governance system, the
government should accelerate the establishment of effective governance structures, actively
promote fiscal transformation, improve the management system for government debts,
establish comprehensive monitoring and regulatory systems for local government debts, and
build long-term mechanisms for preventing and resolving hidden debt risks. Accelerating the
reform and transformation of local financing platforms and providing strong support for
private enterprise innovation is imperative. Local governments need to optimize debt
expenditure structures, reasonably expand the scope of support for local government special
bonds, and enhance the innovation capabilities and competitive advantage of private
enterprises, especially those in emerging industries, through fiscal support, tax incentives, or
innovation funds.
Lastly, according to the QCM assessment results, there are significant differences in the effects
of overdue payment clearance policies across different regions. Therefore, the government
should tailor corresponding institutional constructions during the clearance process based on
the scale of local government debts and regional economic development levels, promoting
balanced regional economic development and overall enhancement of innovation capabilities.
Establishing sound legal systems, demarcating legal boundaries, and fostering a positive
business environment are key to ensuring enterprise innovation and development and are
intrinsic requirements for advancing the rule of law. On one hand, robust supervisory and
auditing systems for governmental financial management and budget execution should be
established, along with internal management and budget control mechanisms to enhance
financial transparency and accountability, ensuring timely settlement of enterprise payments
and enabling enterprises to protect their legitimate rights when facing arrears. On the other
hand, to mitigate adverse impacts on government and social credit environments and enterprise
investment caused by government arrears, the New Budget Law and other relevant financial
regulations should be used as a basis to explore new methods for repaying remaining arrears,
such as asset restructuring and debt swaps, providing legal grounds for enterprises to safeguard
their rights and supervise rectification of government arrears, thereby fostering a transparent
business environment and a proactive innovation environment that promotes a comprehensive
innovation landscape.